After 30 Odd Years of Peace

June 20, 2010 at 10:45 3 comments

On June 5, the Egyptian Supreme Court handed down a ruling, giving the final green light to the new law stripping all Egyptian men married to Jewish Israeli women of their Egyptian citizenship – Muslim or Christian Israeli women can still marry Egyptians without their husbands losing their citizenship.

The law could be criticized for being discriminatory, but Nabil el-Wahash, the lawyer who initiated the law, explains that it is in fact a necessary step to protect Egyptian national security. Since offspring of such a union would be Jewish, and the Israeli Law of Return states that any Jew is eligible for Israeli citizenship, they might take Israeli citizenship and maybe even serve in the Israeli armed forces, heaven forefend.

The Supreme Court agreed with Mr. el-Wahash, and ruled that Egyptian men married to Israeli Jewish women should be stripped of their citizenship.

I’m shocked and appalled by this flawed law and small-minded ruling by the court. This law does in no way protect the Egyptian national security in a satisfactory manner. Israeli men can in fact also transfer their Israeli citizenship to their offspring, even though their children aren’t halakhically Jewish. Furthermore, Jews all over the world could potentially accept Israeli citizenship at any moment – for themselves and for their children.

How can the Egyptian legislators allow such a glaring breach in the nation’s security? The only way to prevent “a new generation of Egyptians ‘disloyal to Egypt and the Arab world'”, is to forbid Egyptian citizens to marry Jews, any Jews, altogether.


Entry filed under: Allosemitism, Politics.

Who’s the Victim, again? The Sound of Tradition?

3 Comments Add your own

  • 1. Marissa  |  June 20, 2010 at 11:00

    are you advocating a new law forbidding all egyptians from marrying Jews? That sounds like the appropriate response!

  • 2. Mikael Tossavainen  |  June 20, 2010 at 12:22

    well, that’s one reading of the post.

    another reading could be that i tried to point out the flaws of the law by taking it to it’s logical, albeit stupid, consequence.

    maybe the headline can give a clue to what i meant…?

  • 3. Marissa  |  June 20, 2010 at 15:32

    haha i know i was kidding. it is obviously a ridiculous law and shows how cold of a peace it really is


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Trackback this post  |  Subscribe to the comments via RSS Feed


June 2010
« May   Jul »

Most Recent Posts

%d bloggers like this: